Wednesday, 05 October 2005

Making existing fuel work better

This one may come across as a longshot - and for that matter, it may sound like a commercial for a product. I assure, it is not [ "I’m not a real shill, I only play one on my blog"].

First, a little background. I used to own a Subaru WRX. For those not familiar, the WRX is a ’stealth’ performance car. It looks like just another compact Japanese sedan, but it sports a turbocharged motor that is an absolute kick in the pants to drive - extremely fast acceleration, amazing all-wheel-drive handling, etc.

For someone interested in conserving energy, it would surely seem like a poor choice. On balance though, compared with such delights as the Hummer and ginormous Cadillac Escalade - vehicles that sport miles per gallon ratings in the single digits - the WRX is practically an economy car. In the three or so years I had it, I averaged about 21 miles per gallon, and that was driving it very hard. The downside though was that it required Premium fuel, preferably 92 - 93 octane or higher.

Shortly after I got the car, California reduced the mandated octane rating for Premium to 91 octane. While the car could handle that fine, I really wanted to maintain the performance. After much searching on the internet, I ran across a product called "GTA Fuel Enhancer". Unlike the majority of fuel enhancers, it’s not a cleaner, or an alcohol, or any sort of direct octane booster. GTA is a hydrocarbon viscosity modifier. Put in the most basic terms, it’s this slimy, snotty ‘fluid’, you add a couple of ounces to a tank of gas, and it increases the uniformity of the fuel droplets that are injected into either the carburetor or directly into the cylinder. That makes for a more uniform burn, and reduces detonation - ‘pinging’ - so in other words, it increases the effective octane of the fuel.

I’ve used the GTA for a couple of years now, and can attest that it does seem to restore the octane. Its easy to experience the Placebo Effect with such things, so I won’t say in unqualified terms that it does do what it says it does - but it certainly felt like it. As well, my wife recently started using it in her 1986 Toyota Pickup, which has 216,000 miles on the original engine. It has a tendency to ping when at highway speeds and under some load. The use of the GTA eliminates that.

The cost, when bought in bulk (gallon), amounts to about $1.00 per tank. when filling a tank can cost upwards of $45, that’s a small cost.

Does it increase fuel economy? No idea. I enjoy the feeling of acceleration, so I’m a bit of a leadfoot. I never know what my mileage for a tank will be. However, the GTA folks claim it increases gas mileage, and they have quite a bit of non-sensational info on their site to back it.

Oh, I no longer have my beloved WRX. The cost of the premium gasoline, plus the fact that I work from home - meaning it sat gathering dust in the garage more than six days out of seven - led me to sell it recently. I bought a Subaru Forester instead. Haven’t gone through the first tank of gas yet, so i don’t know what kind of mileage it gets. I presume it’ll be slightly better than the WRX, but the fact it takes regular grade gasoline will save a good chunk of money.

I would encourage others to try GTA. I will note for the record I have absolutely no association with them. I bought their ‘goo’, and that’s the extent of it. But other, less lead-footed, may be able to report back whether it increases their gas mileage.

Powered by Gregarious (21)
Permalink • Print • Comment

Trackback uri

http://www.energynucleus.com/index.php/2005/10/05/making-existing-fuel-work-better/trackback/

4 Comments »

Thursday, 13 October 2005

Tombstone :

Are you familiar with adding Acetone to your gas?  Just a couple of ounces per 15 gallons - PREMIUM gas.  Not regular.  Just Premium.

You’ll see a 15 to 35% increase in mileage. Sounds crazy - but I’ve seen it myself and I have two friends who do this.

Lots of websites about this.  Google it out.

I just checked out this GTA fuel enhancer product.  Looks like super high-priced acetone to me!

Friday, 14 October 2005

Paul Theodoropoulos :

well, the GTA operates on a different principle. but yeah, it is much more expensive than acetone. the questions that arise for me are - what are the byproducts of acetone combustion (sure - obviously, at only an ounce or two a tank they’ll be minimal, but what if the byproducts are like plutonium coming out of your tailpipe! [that’s a bit of hyperbole for effect of course!]) and then there’s the VOC’s associated with handling acetone, which are definitely smog producers. the GTA is a thick goo, it is flammable but only barely volatile - so i have no concerns handling it in the garage near the water heater, not like say spilling some acetone. i would worry about acetone drying out seals. but that’s just the first thing that comes to mind, i haven’t done any research.

Tuesday, 18 October 2005

J. Moore :

My favorite information site for this subject is: pureenergysystems.com - acetone. The information comes from veterans in the fuel and automotive industry. 

Leave a comment




Bad Behavior has blocked 329 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Close
E-mail It
Made with WordPress and the Semiologic theme and CMS • Strawberry Cream skin by Antonella Pavese